A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among future neighbours in excess of the development of the wall at a coastal internet site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a situation that has attracted countrywide attention adhering to an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental problems, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development will work at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, seek out to create their household dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. According to the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being made by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Highway, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment on a Exclusive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such places are issue to rigid controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal natural environment such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, that's partially crafted, is in the right place. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of The ocean are both equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-high h2o during a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, an image that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic with the intensity from the dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they had been intended to Acquire Visible proof with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site within the sea Irish Situations claimed, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the water throughout severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm water to photograph the site turned Among the most hanging descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that this kind of steps had been cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a region René Collier influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was being encroached upon.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up covered intimately by the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 became commonly searched phrases as readers sought to be aware of the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read further submissions on regardless of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second inside the legal timeline.
In the core of your dispute is a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of setting up paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is inspired by concern for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair merely seeking to create a relatives home in accordance Along with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Specific Area of Conservation and say that all performs are actually carried out determined by Experienced advice and accepted strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering The ocean throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying details.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among non-public land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Instances write-up about René Collier noted which the businessman had Beforehand been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very unique Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The courtroom need to establish if the wall as created complies with arranging permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and arranging problems. Nevertheless the human component remains central: neighbours who will have to Are living along with each other extensive following the legal costs have been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the case extend outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. Furthermore, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential troubles such as environmental defense and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of purely natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Regardless of whether it can ultimately be altered, taken off, or completed as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely watched planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.